imgadp

Top-Hot-Stocks

Hot Article ------ Favorites this page

2009-07-04

A Clear Picture On The US Debt Situation

With all of the rhetoric, obfuscation, and spin coming out of Washington these days, some might find it hard to see just where our current policies are leading us. One look at the following chart of federal receipts, outlays, and borrowing, however, and the facts seem pretty clear.

Deficit

Put that together with the following report from the Associated Press, “Mountain of Debt: Rising Debt May Be Next Crisis,” and it makes you wonder whether this year’s July 4th holiday should really be a time for celebration.

The Founding Fathers left one legacy not celebrated on Independence Day but which affects us all. It’s the national debt.

The country first got into debt to help pay for the Revolutionary War. Growing ever since, the debt stands today at a staggering $11.5 trillion - equivalent to over $37,000 for each and every American. And it’s expanding by over $1 trillion a year.

The mountain of debt easily could become the next full-fledged economic crisis without firm action from Washington, economists of all stripes warn.

“Unless we demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal sustainability in the longer term, we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth,” Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke recently told Congress.

Higher taxes, or reduced federal benefits and services - or a combination of both - may be the inevitable consequences.

The debt is complicating efforts by President Barack Obama and Congress to cope with the worst recession in decades as stimulus and bailout spending combine with lower tax revenues to widen the gap.

Interest payments on the debt alone cost $452 billion last year - the largest federal spending category after Medicare-Medicaid, Social Security and defense. It’s quickly crowding out all other government spending. And the Treasury is finding it harder to find new lenders.

The United States went into the red the first time in 1790 when it assumed $75 million in the war debts of the Continental Congress.

Alexander Hamilton, the first treasury secretary, said, “A national debt, if not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.”

Some blessing.

Since then, the nation has only been free of debt once, in 1834-1835.

The national debt has expanded during times of war and usually contracted in times of peace, while staying on a generally upward trajectory. Over the past several decades, it has climbed sharply - except for a respite from 1998 to 2000, when there were annual budget surpluses, reflecting in large part what turned out to be an overheated economy.

The debt soared with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and economic stimulus spending under President George W. Bush and now Obama.

The odometer-style “debt clock” near Times Square - put in place in 1989 when the debt was a mere $2.7 trillion - ran out of numbers and had to be shut down when the debt surged past $10 trillion in 2008.

The clock has since been refurbished so higher numbers fit. There are several debt clocks on Web sites maintained by public interest groups that let you watch hundreds, thousands, millions zip by in a matter of seconds.

The debt gap is “something that keeps me awake at night,” Obama says.

He pledged to cut the budget “deficit” roughly in half by the end of his first term. But “deficit” just means the difference between government receipts and spending in a single budget year.

This year’s deficit is now estimated at about $1.85 trillion.

Deficits don’t reflect holdover indebtedness from previous years. Some spending items - such as emergency appropriations bills and receipts in the Social Security program - aren’t included, either, although they are part of the national debt.

The national debt is a broader, and more telling, way to look at the government’s balance sheets than glancing at deficits.

According to the Treasury Department, which updates the number “to the penny” every few days, the national debt was $11,518,472,742,288 on Wednesday.

The overall debt is now slightly over 80 percent of the annual output of the entire U.S. economy, as measured by the gross domestic product.

By historical standards, it’s not proportionately as high as during World War II, when it briefly rose to 120 percent of GDP. But it’s still a huge liability.

Also, the United States is not the only nation struggling under a huge national debt. Among major countries, Japan, Italy, India, France, Germany and Canada have comparable debts as percentages of their GDPs.

Where does the government borrow all this money from?

The debt is largely financed by the sale of Treasury bonds and bills. Even today, amid global economic turmoil, those still are seen as one of the world’s safest investments.

That’s one of the rare upsides of U.S. government borrowing.

Treasury securities are suitable for individual investors and popular with other countries, especially China, Japan and the Persian Gulf oil exporters, the three top foreign holders of U.S. debt.

But as the U.S. spends trillions to stabilize the recession-wracked economy, helping to force down the value of the dollar, the securities become less attractive as investments. Some major foreign lenders are already paring back on their purchases of U.S. bonds and other securities.

And if major holders of U.S. debt were to flee, it would send shock waves through the global economy - and sharply force up U.S. interest rates.

As time goes by, demographics suggest things will get worse before they get better, even after the recession ends, as more baby boomers retire and begin collecting Social Security and Medicare benefits.

While the president remains personally popular, polls show there is rising public concern over his handling of the economy and the government’s mushrooming debt - and what it might mean for future generations.

If things can’t be turned around, including establishing a more efficient health care system, “We are on an utterly unsustainable fiscal course,” said the White House budget director, Peter Orszag.

Some budget-restraint activists claim even the debt understates the nation’s true liabilities.

The Peter G. Peterson Foundation, established by a former commerce secretary and investment banker, argues that the $11.4 trillion debt figures does not take into account roughly $45 trillion in unlisted liabilities and unfunded retirement and health care commitments.

That would put the nation’s full obligations at $56 trillion, or roughly $184,000 per American, according to this calculation.

ETFs That May Be Affected By Clean Energy Bill

Last Friday, the House passed the Waxman-Markey Clean Energy Bill, in an effort to reduce the U.S. addiction to oil and adopt more clean energy practices. The bill is in the Senate, and if it passes, it could have a wide-ranging impact on certain exchange traded funds (ETFs).

The goal of the bill is to reduce carbon emissions while practicing clean energy techniques rather than rely on oil for most of our energy needs. According to Rober Kropp for Social Funds, Republican Senators are attacking the bill as a form of taxation that will pass intolerable costs to American taxpayers.

Key provisions of the bill include:

  • Requiring electric utilities to meet 20% of their electricity demand through renewable energy sources and energy efficiency by 2020.
  • Investing $190 billion in new clean energy technologies and energy efficiency.
  • Mandating new energy-saving standards for buildings, appliances and industry.
  • Introducing a federal cap-and-trade program to reduce carbon emissions by 17% by 2020 and more than 80% by 2050, compared to 2005 levels.
  • All of this must occur without passing the expense onto consumers.

The passage of this bill will open the door for a clean energy-focused economy while keeping our dependence on foreign oil to a minimum. The ETFs below are just an example, but there are a number of other funds that target specific alternative energy sectors, such as wind and solar power.

  • First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge ETF (QCLN: 13.724 -0.276 -1.97%)

  • PowerShares Cleantech Portfolio (PZD: 20.40 -0.5383 -2.57%)

  • Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy ETF (GEX: 24.14 -0.48 -1.95%)

Expected Next 30-Day Volatility Is Still Well Above The Non-Crisis Level

One simple way to translate the VIX index (^VIX: 27.95 +1.73 +6.60%) into an easy to understand monthly implied volatility is employing the following equation:

Next Month Expected Volatility = VIX/100/sqrt(12)

The result simply says that over the 30-day period, the SP500 is expected to have a volatility of plus/minus a given percentage.

The following graph shows the historical next 30-day expected volatility from 1990 to 2009. This does reflect the change in VIX calculation method that was instituted in 2003.

The simple historical average of the 1-month expected volatility for last 19 years is at 5.827%. Rising above this level usually represents some kind of turmoil and crisis. Examples include:

1.  Gulf War in the early 90s.

2.  Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) in 1998

3.  2000 tech bubble burst

4.  Sep 11th terrorist attack

5. Inital subprime mortgage crisis

6. Collapse of Bear Stearns

7. Collapse of Lehman/AIG and the following financial and economic collapse

Thus, until the expected monthly volatility of the SP500 goes below its historical average of 5.827% for a sustained period of time, all we can say is that the market simply is taking a break from its primary trend.

I hear a lot of people are still expecting the SP500 to go to 1000 and above. I am not saying that is not a possibility but taking such a position at this point is fairly dangerous. We have to ask ourselves “Is the economic climate improved?” The answer is simply no. Deceleration of economic decline does not translate into economic improvement. I continue to remind people that the current recession has been over 18 months now surpassing all previous recessions and there is still no clear end in sight. If the economy does not pull itself out in the next 6-12 months, we are likely heading towards the 2nd Depression defined as a prolonged period of recession lasting more than two to three years.

America: Decline Or Revival?

As my American friends fire up the barbeque on this Independence Day weekend, I invite them (and my other readers) to ponder the long-term fate of America.

The end of Pax Americana?
The past few weeks has seen more bad news for American standing and influence. The Chinese are questioning the long-term supremacy of the US Dollar as reserve currency again:

Top officials, including Premier Wen Jiabao, have openly expressed concern about Chinese investment in the US. The country has also actively mooted the idea of a super sovereign reserve currency to replace the dollar.

Besides, it has also sought to promote the use of the yuan for foreign trade and investment; a first step, some think, toward challenging the dollar’s status as the preferred currency of international trade and capital flow.

Meanwhile, Econbrowser reports that the US continues to go into debt, as it moved from a net debtor in the 1980s to a deeply indebted position today.

Or revival?
On the other hand, John Mauldin recently posted a remarkably optimistic view of American revival, based on the work of Neil Howe [emphasis mine]:

The potentially good news…is that the Crisis we’re now entering will change pretty much everything. While this change will entail a great deal of pain and a reduced standard of living for a large number of people, by the time the Crisis subsides, society will have pretty much remade itself in ways that no one can predict at this point…

Neil Howe turns to his generational profiles and points out that the rising societal power today belongs to the generation he calls the Millennials, individuals born between 1982 and 2004. They are a “Hero” generation, just like the G.I. Generation that coped so well with the turmoil of the Great Depression and World War II — the last Fourth Turning. Coddled as children, the G.I.s were ultimately called upon to help society through a dark and dangerous period and rose to the occasion…

[These] periods have always resulted in the nation redefining who we are in some essential way. That was certainly the case during the American Revolution, when we transitioned from a British colony into a collection of independent states — and the Civil War, when those states were hammered into a single nation. And, again, after World War II, when the U.S. went from being a relatively isolated nation to a global empire. A wild card, for instance a terrorist nuke going off in a city anywhere on the planet, could similarly take the country, and the world, into unforeseeable new directions.

Of course, this optimistic view is highly dependent on America getting through the crisis intact.

A Singularity in history
Does America decline or will we see a new Renaissance?

I believe that we are approaching a Singularity, or a discontinuity, in history. All that we know is that we are approaching a Singularity but we cannot forecast what happens afterwards (that’s why it’s called a Singularity).

Consider the words of blogger Fabius Maximus, who wrote the following in February 2007, well before the onset of the current financial crisis, about the Singularity and the challenges that Americans face:

This transition will be like a singularity in astrophysics, a point where the rules breakdown - and beyond which we cannot see.

Such trials appear throughout history. Consider Russia in 1942. Ruled by a madman. Their government had betrayed the hopes of the revolution, killed tens of millions, and reduced the nation to poverty. Most of their generals were dead, their armies were in full retreat, and vast areas were controlled by a ruthless invader.

The mark of a great people is the ability to carry on when all is lost, including hope. We can learn much from the Russian people’s behavior in WWII.

For investors, such a scenario involves a high degree of market volatility and fat-tailed returns. Be prepared.

Hotel Metrics Down, Others Finally Catching On

The second quarter of 2009 proved to be even more challenging than the first for hotel companies in the United States. And as it becomes increasingly clear that a recovery in the industry isn’t likely to happen any time in the near term, others on Wall Street have begun to change their outlooks.

After declining 19.0% in the first quarter of the year, weekly average revenue per available room, or RevPAR, declined 20.1% in the second quarter. Looking at the composition of these numbers, however, we see that the damage to the businesses was even greater than the 110 basis point change.

Average weekly occupancy declined 11.6% in the second quarter, compared to a decline of 12.5% year-over-year in the first quarter. However, hoteliers began cutting room rates more substantially during the just-ended quarter, with Q2 average daily rate, or ADR, down 9.6% versus the year-ago period. In the first quarter, ADR was down 7.4% year-over-year.

By continuing to cut room rates in an attempt to fill rooms, we believe that the hotel operators are actually more likely to increase the length and severity of this downturn. Changes in ADR have a greater impact on profitability, as more of the change falls directly to the bottom line. In addition, hotel companies will likely have difficulty pushing room rates higher even after the economy has stabilized.

We have been negative on the lodging sector for months, as we have maintained that investors have been too optimistic regarding the chances for a second-half recovery in the group.

Earlier this week, an analyst at a major Wall Street brokerage firm lowered their outlook on the group to negative, and lowered their rating on shares of Starwood Hotels (HOT: 20.90 -0.41 -1.92%) and Marriott International (MAR: 20.39 -0.79 -3.73%) to Underweight.

We have had Sell ratings on these shares for some time, and as we recently noted, the shares have begun to pull back after rallying along with the broad market for approximately three months.

As the challenges facing the group going forward become more obvious, we anticipate that more investors will realize that a near-term recovery in operating fundamentals is highly unlikely. As a result, we expect to see more pressure on the shares of lodging companies in the coming months.